Compare and contrast sun tzu and clausewitz

Clausewitz recognized the importance and expressed it by saying, to paraphrase, a good general can give the orders, but the soldier must have the wherewithal to follow them. They also would agree that in the best cases wars should be short.

A third difference of opinion between Sun Tzu and Clausewitz is the goal when engaging the enemy army. The writings of Miyamoto Musashi reflect this. Finally, Sun Tzu worked for a nation that had a manpower disadvantage vs.

The longer the fight, the more it taxed not only the fighting man, but the home front as well, as more conscripts would be needed and more taxes levied to pay for them.

Sun Tzu just assumes that the broad nature of war stays the same, even as tactics and technology changes.

The Battle of the Military Theorists: Clausewitz vs. Sun Tzu

That outcome is very, very unlikely, particularly for the war-fighting general. August 12, at Despite these differences, Sun Tzu and Clausewitz do have much in common. Sun-Tzu has always struck me as being somewhat one-sided while Clausewitz seems to present a more rounded theory.

A fair fight would have meant Pyrrhic victories.

When he says subduing the enemy without fighting is the acme, he is stating an ideal. Certainly Napoleon and Frederick the Great would be spoken of from wars of an earlier time.

The preferred methods for success in these matters would be the use of diplomacy, propaganda, and secret agents. The rest is about how to achieve victories, with your thumb on the scale to skew the outcome as much as can possibly be done. But it is surprising he would not give more credence to these ideas like Sun Tzu did, especially since he clearly realized the close relationship between politics and war.

This anti-glory stance probably won him few friends, but still, the core is very Napoleonic calculation: His philosophy reflects that. When one thinks of war and of those who fight it, many names may come to mind.

Hardcore, disciplined professionals with high cohesion and strong leadership led them to maximize their odds while cultivating far greater aggressiveness. Both put a premium on the importance of morale, both for the commander armies and the home front. March 13, by Ando VS.

Picture him in a TV interview as one of the octoheads during the recent North African adventure. I believe the immortality achieved by this work was due precisely to its abbreviation.

I enjoyed your post and have been reading other posts of yours on this blog. Perhaps it is my western heritage and upbringing that make me uncomfortable with his philosophy. Furthermore, when you are numerically inferior, a fair fight promises, at best, a Pyrrhic victory; so, Sun Tzu developed a philosophy about not fighting fair.

Thats where the power is. They change a lot. But, yes, a grain of salt is just fine with me. What gets me about the philosophy of Sun-Tzu is the lengths to which tells us to go to achieve victory without fighting.

They understood that giving the men a reason to fight, and keep on fighting is critical. Armies in that era were perishable and fragile entities that were held together through the personal leadership of generals more than any other factor.

CvC goes on and on for pages and pages allowing himself to be misquoted. August 31, at He would be wiping the floor with his puthy sayings an making eyes at the blonde reported while CvC went on and on about this and that and lost the atention of the typical viewer.

Sun-Tzu & Clausewitz: A Comparison

If pinned down to make a decision, which I am, I would probably agree more with Clausewitz mainly because of his recognition of the friction that occurs on the battlefield. That is not necessarily a bad thing.The gap between Sun Tzu's The Art of War (3rd or 4th century B.C.) and Carl von Clausewitz's On War () could hardly be greater in terms of time, geographic conditions, and.

Mar 13,  · So in contrast to Sun Tzu’s idea of winning the victory without a fight, Clausewitz stresses the fight as the key to success. Another diverging area of these two war theorists is the notion of the predictability of war.

It is a combined effort of compare/contrast Sun Tzu and Carl von Clausewitz's philosophies and how they apply to America's current War on Terrorism stance/5(2). Sun-Tzu & Clausewitz: A Comparison. August 5, August 4, by Patrick Shrier. Both Sun-Tzu and Clausewitz have something to offer for the serious student of warfare.

The biggest distinction between the two seems to be their different approaches to the art of war. Sun-Tzu advocates a more subtle and indirect approach to the art of war. Jul 18,  · These are the sources and citations used to research difference and similarities in theories between clausewitz and sun tzu.

This bibliography was generated on Cite This For Me on Friday, July 17, Sep 15,  · In terms of military strategy; how will you compare Chanakya, Sun Tzu, Machiavelli and Clausewitz?

How influential is Clausewitz in modern military theory? Sun Tzu vs Napoleon vs Clausewitz vs Chanakya: Who is the best strategist?

Compare and contrast sun tzu and clausewitz
Rated 4/5 based on 2 review